Inequity In the Electoral College

This is some "analysis" I did of the possibilities and characteristics of the way that the Electoral College is set up.

States won by 1	Population	Electoral Votes	States won by2	Population	Electoral Votes
California	36132147	55	North Carolina	8683242	15
Texas	22859968	35	Virginia	7567465	13
New York	19254630	31	Massachusetts	6398743	12
Florida	17789864	27	Missouri	5800310	11
Illinois	12763371	21	Tennessee	5962959	11
Pennsylvania	12429616	21	Washington	6287759	11
Ohio	11464042	20	Arizona	5939292	10
Michigan	10120860	17	Maryland	5600388	10
Georgia	9072576	15	Minnesota	5132799	10
New Jersey	8717925	15	Wisconsin	5536201	10
Indiana	6271973	11	Alabama	4557808	9
	166876972	268	Colorado	4665177	9
			Kentucky	4173405	9
			Louisiana	4523628	8
			South Carolina	4255083	8
			Connecticut	3510297	7
			Iowa	2966334	7
			Oklahoma	3547884	7
			Oregon	3641056	7
			Arkansas	2779154	6
			Kansas	2744687	6
			Mississippi	2921088	6
			Nebraska	1758787	5
			Nevada	2414807	5
			New Mexico	1928384	5
			West Virginia	1816856	5
			Hawaii	1275194	4
			Idaho	1429096	4
			Maine	1321505	4
			New Hampshire	1309940	4
			Rhode Island	1076189	4
			Utah	2469585	4
			Alaska	663661	3
			D.C.	550521	3
			Delaware	843524	3
			Montana	935670	3
			North Dakota	636677	3
			South Dakota	775933	3
			Vermont	623050	3
			Wyoming	509294	3
				129533432	270
Total Voters	85107255		Total Voters	77720059
Votes Won	85107255	___268	Votes Won	39637230	[270
Votes Lost	0		Votes Lost	38082829
Vote Total 2	124744485		Vote Total 3	39637230

That table shows how it would be possible for a candidate to receive in excess of 75% of the popular vote, yet still lose due to the electoral count, and that is with clear majority wins in every single state, not pluralities brought on by three or more candidates. If you included those possibilities, the discrepancy would be even larger. The situation has one candidate winning states worth 268 electoral votes, and carrying them with 100% of the vote. The remaining states are split 51/49 in favor of the other candidate. While such an occurrence is so unlikely as to be virtually impossible, it highlights what I believe to be a deep flaw in the means by which we elect our commander in chief. The pie chart below illustrates the incongruency very well:

The following table expresses the relative worth of each individual vote, as compared in multiples of Florida, which I found has the least value of any other state.

State	Population	Electoral Votes	Per Vote	Rank	Worth (Multiples of Florida)
Alabama	4557808	9	506423	24	1.3
Alaska	663661	3	221220	5	2.98
Arizona	5939292	10	593929	43	1.11
Arkansas	2779154	6	463192	19	1.42
California	36132147	55	656948	50	1.003
Colorado	4665177	9	518353	27	1.27
Connecticut	3510297	7	501471	23	1.31
D.C.	550521	3	183506	2	3.59
Delaware	843524	3	281174	8	2.34
Florida	17789864	27	658883	51	1
Georgia	9072576	15	604838	45	1.09
Hawaii	1275194	4	318798	10	2.07
Idaho	1429096	4	357274	14	1.84
Illinois	12763371	21	607779	46	1.08
Indiana	6271973	11	570179	36	1.16
Iowa	2966334	7	428047	17	1.54
Kansas	2744687	6	457447	18	1.44
Kentucky	4173405	9	463711	20	1.42
Louisiana	4523628	8	565453	35	1.17
Maine	1321505	4	330376	12	1.99
Maryland	5600388	10	560038	34	1.18
Massachusetts	6398743	12	533228	31	1.24
Michigan	10120860	17	595344	44	1.11
Minnesota	5132799	10	513279	26	1.28
Mississippi	2921088	6	486848	22	1.35
Missouri	5800310	11	527300	29	1.25
Montana	935670	3	311890	9	2.11
Nebraska	1758787	5	351757	13	1.87
Nevada	2414807	5	482961	21	1.36
New Hampshire	1309940	4	327485	11	2.01
New Jersey	8717925	15	581195	40	1.13
New Mexico	1928384	5	385676	16	1.71
New York	19254630	31	621117	48	1.06
North Carolina	8683242	15	578882	39	1.14
North Dakota	636677	3	212225	4	3.1
Ohio	11464042	20	573202	38	1.15
Oklahoma	3547884	7	506840	25	1.3
Oregon	3641056	7	520150	28	1.27
Pennsylvania	12429616	21	591886	42	1.11
Rhode Island	1076189	4	269047	7	2.45
South Carolina	4255083	8	531885	30	1.24
South Dakota	775933	3	258644	6	2.55
Tennessee	5962959	11	542087	32	1.22
Texas	22859968	35	653141	49	1.009
Utah	2469585	4	617396	47	1.07
Vermont	623050	3	207683	3	3.17
Virginia	7567465	13	582112	41	1.13
Washington	6287759	11	571614	37	1.15
West Virginia	1816856	5	363371	15	1.81
Wisconsin	5536201	10	553620	33	1.19
Wyoming	509294	3	169764	1	3.88

As you can see, most of the states have similar worths to Florida, while a few peak much higher than the rest. In particular, a vote in Wyoming is worth nearly four times as much as a similar vote in Florida, with Washington DC not being very far below Wyoming.

Worth	# of States
1	3
1.1	10
1.2	9
1.3	7
1.4	5
1.5	1
1.7	1
1.8	2
1.9	1
2	2
2.1	2
2.3	1
2.5	1
2.6	1
3	1
3.1	1
3.2	1
3.6	1
3.9	1

The preceding table shows the distribution of vote value among the states. States worth 3 or more times Florida are very rare, with only 5 of them, making up less than one-tenth of the total. On the other hand, states worth less than twice that of Florida number 39. This next chart contains the same information as the table above, just in a more aesthetic way.

One of the bedrock fundamentals of the idea of the United States of America is equal justice under law. As it stands now, people's votes in presidential elections are far from equal. When someone's vote is worth nearly four times that of another's, that is not an example of equal treatment under the law. The way it is set up now should be changed; the Electoral College doesn't work in a country that values equality. It should be replaced with direct popular voting, Instant Run Off Voting, or any of a number of alternatives that provide for every single person's vote to be worth and treated the same. No one should be granted special statuses, or lesser ones.